This application note describes Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) method development, ideal for protein and conjugated protein characterization using non-denaturing, hydrophobic-based separations.
Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) is a technique for separation of proteins, peptides, and other biomolecules based on their relative degree of hydrophobicity. However, unlike reversed-phase chromatography, HIC is a non-denaturing technique. Therefore, the native form of the proteins is expected to be maintained, which is beneficial if one wants to further study the biological characteristics of the separated proteins.
In a HIC separation, the hydrophobic ligands on the stationary phase interact with the hydrophobic regions on the surface of the protein and the retention mechanism is due to adsorption – desorption equilibrium in the presence of salts. In practice, proteins bind to the HIC stationary phase in the presence of high concentration of salt, and are eluted in the order of increasing hydrophobicity by decreasing the salt concentration.
HIC has been used increasingly in protein and conjugated protein (e.g., antibody drug conjugates [ADCs]) separations requiring systematic method development to obtain the optimal separation conditions for these non-denaturing separations. This application note will guide users through the “Tips and Tricks” of HIC method development.
HIC Protein Standard Test Mix (p/n 186007953): Bovine Ribonuclease A (0.05 mg/vial), Horse Cytochrome c (0.025 mg/vial), Horse Myoglobin (0.05 mg/vial), Chicken Lysozyme (0.03 mg/vial), Yeast Enolase (0.10 mg/vial), Alpha chymotrypsinogen A (0.05 mg/vial)
LC system: |
ACQUITY UPLC H-Class Bio with TUV Detector |
Sample temp.: |
4 °C |
Analytical column temp.: |
30 °C |
Flow rate: |
0.6 mL/min |
Injection volume: |
2 μl |
Column: |
Protein-Pak Hi Res HIC, 2.5 μm, 4.6 mm x 100 mm and HIC Protein Standard (p/n 176003576) |
Detection: |
UV absorbance at 220 nm |
Sample collection: |
TruView Vial (p/n 186005668cv) |
Mobile phase A: |
2 M (NH4)2SO4 in 50 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4, pH 6.9 |
Mobile phase B: |
50 mM NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4, pH 6.9 |
Data management: |
Empower Pro (v2) |
Time (mL/min) |
Flow rate |
%A |
%B |
Curve |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.0 |
0.6 |
100 |
0 |
|
15.0 |
0.6 |
0 |
100 |
6 |
18.0 |
0.6 |
0 |
100 |
11 |
19.0 |
0.6 |
100 |
0 |
11 |
30.0 |
0.0 |
100 |
0 |
11 |
HIC separation is based on the interaction between the hydrophobic ligands on HIC media and the hydrophobic surfaces on proteins. In pure water or a low-ionic strength buffer, the hydrophobic interactions between ligands and proteins should ideally be weak enough to allow the protein to elute from the column without the use of an organic modifier in the elution buffer. However, certain salts enhance these desired hydrophobic interactions, and adding such salts brings about binding (adsorption) to HIC media. For selective elution (desorption), the salt concentration is lowered gradually via gradient elution and the sample components elute in the order of hydrophobicity with less eluting prior to more hydrophobic components.
Figure 1 shows the chromatogram of the six proteins in the HIC Protein Standard Test Mix (p/n 186007953) using the conditions specified in the Experimental section.
The type and concentration of salt used to dissolve the sample, as well as that used in the HIC mobile phases, will influence the separation. Changing the type of salt and the starting salt concentrationcan change the selectivity of the obtained separation.
Some ions are more kosmotropic and therefore are more effective in “salting out” protein and driving hydrophobic interactions compared to use of other salts. The strength of HIC binding follows the order of Hofmeister “salting-out” series for protein precipitation.
While increasing salt concentration increases protein binding capacity via the “salting out” mechanism, too high a salt concentration may result in protein precipitation.
Figure 2 shows a separation of the HIC Protein Standard Test Mix (p/n 186007953) using various NaCl gradient separations. Note that NaCl is not very effective for use in HIC since not all proteins bind to the HIC column even at 3.5 M concentration. By comparison, and as seen in Figure 3, Na2SO4 is more effective than use of NaCl for the HIC separation of proteins in this mix. Furthermore, use of (NH4)2SO4 (Figure 4) is even more effective in separating the protein mix.
For some strongly hydrophobic proteins, non-polar solvents such as acetonitrile may be required for elution (reference 4).
The effect that pH has on HIC-based protein separations is not straightforward nor is it predictable, yet this variable certainly can affect component selectivity.1
Figure 5 shows the results of a single variable experiment where only pH was varied. It is clear from these data that a greater degree of separation between peaks 1 and 2 and between peaks 4 and 5 is at pH 8. However, a greater degree of separation between peaks 2 and 3 and peaks 5 and 6 is seen at pH 6.0.
In general, an increase in temperature increases hydrophobic interaction, as seen in Figure 6 between proteins and HIC Butyl ligand. This can have a significant impact as noted in the overall retention and subtle separation differences observed between 30 °C and 40 °C. It is therefore important to use a column temperature control for HIC separations in order to obtain reproducible results. As suggested by the 50 °C data, higher temperatures may result in a poor chromatographic recovery and peak shape for some proteins.
In summary, in developing a HIC-based separation of a protein mixture, the following suggestions should be considered:
720005514, December 2015